Notwithstanding: Legal Definition Explained
In legal parlance, "notwithstanding" is often employed in a contractual provision to mean that the particular provision of the contract shall be controlling. As applied, the overriding nature of "notwithstanding" may apply notwithstanding any other provision or provisions of the contract. See Mt. Holyoke Mills Corp. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 98 Ga.App. 244, 105 S.E.2d 824 (1958). Accordingly, while "notwithstanding" does not, as its plain meaning might suggest, mean "despite," it essentially works in reverse to allow a given provision of a contract to override other provisions of the contract that it specifically references. See In re Healthy Pets, Inc., 580 B.R. 703, 707 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2017). "Notwithstanding" is a transitional word that is commonly used at the beginning of a sentence, clause or paragraph to signal to the reader that what follows will be controlling despite any contrary provision in the document as a whole. "Notwithstanding" is synonymous with "regardless of" and "despite." See Black’s Law Dictionary (11th Ed. 2019). In the context of federal rules, "[t]he word notwithstanding … is used to indicate an exception to the general rule which would otherwise apply in a particular situation." Ctr. for Envtl. Innovation v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n, No. 16-1220 , 2017 WL 5509894, at *6 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 17, 2017) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 10th ed. 2016). The plain language meaning of "notwithstanding" is "[d]espite; notwithstanding." Black’s Law Dictionary 1218 (10th ed. 2014). "Notwithstanding" is "foreign to the most graceful English Construction, but is in very familiar use in Law, to express Exceptions from the general Power of given Rulers." Black’s Law Dictionary 1218 (10th ed. 2014), quoting Thomas Erskine, Institutes of the Law of Scotland, at xi (1853). The word "notwithstanding" is a term that a reasonable person would understand, and as such it is not ambiguous. See Mt. Holyoke Mills Corp., 98 Ga.App. at 244 (quoting Williston on Contracts. Kimes Edition [New York], Vol. 10, Sec. 1068 (1942 Supp.)). "Notwithstanding" is not a technical term, and "[it] has not assumed a special meaning in the law." Id. Where "notwithstanding" is used in a legal document without a limiting clause, the specific words that have been "notwithstanding" must be construed in light of common sense and justice, as there is no rule of construction that the term supersedes all other provisions in the document. See Local No. 557 Amalgamated, Inc., United Paper Workers Int’l, A.F.L.-C.I.O., C.L.C. v. Saco Locomotive Works, 310 F.2d 780, 785 (1st Cir. 1962).